BitbucketvsGit.HubvsGitlab.

Bitbucket

25.7K
19.1克
+ 1
2.8K
Git.Hub

130.9K
98.8K.
+ 1
10.1K
Gitlab.

30.2 k.
23.1K.
+ 1
2.3K

github与bitbucket与gitlab - 帮助我决定


在任何软件项目的某些时候,您需要与其他开发人员共享代码。如果你使用了Git for Source Control,有三个主要选项:GitHub.,Bitbucket, orGitlab.。Understanding the differences and tradeoffs between these three repository management platforms is vital to choosing the best option for your team.

Pull (or Merge) Request Process

任何基于团队的版本控制平台的核心功能之一是Pull请求过程。这通常会发生在团队成员完成新功能时,并希望将其代码合并到Codebase的开发或生产分支中。

The feature to be merged will typically be reviewed by another developer during a code review process, and they may want to use the pull request (called “merge request” in Gitlab) feature included in the repository management platform. Let’s take a look at the differences between Github, Bitbucket, and Gitlab in this area.

1. Github’s Pull Request Feature

The在GitHub中提取请求过程is designed with team-based projects in mind. In order to facilitate that workflow, Github provides some interesting features:

  • 为队友分配拉出请求
  • Attach milestones, projects, and labels to provide context
  • Subscribe to be notified when the pull request changes
  • Diff of changes between source and base branch
  • One-click merge and delete source branch
  • 与外部连续集成工具集成
  • Pull request templates to ensure contributing guidelines are being followed
  • 需要分辨率的代码的部分周围的对话
  • Required reviews to ensure that every pull request is signed off by someone before the merge

2. Bitbucket的拉出请求功能

Bitbucket的拉出请求是类似的,虽然他们不提供与许多功能一样。Bitbucket确实提供了您需要的一切:

  • 为队友分配拉出请求
  • 用于评论和描述的高级文本编辑器
  • Subscribe to be notified when the pull request changes
  • Diff of changes between source and base branch
  • One-click merge and delete source branch
  • 与外部连续集成工具集成
  • 选择在合并之前要求审阅者批准的选项

3. Gitlab’s Merge Request Feature

虽然以不同的方式命名,Gitlab.merge requestswork pretty much the same way as pull requests. You get most of the same core features:

  • Assign merge requests to teammates
  • WIP(正在进行的工作)指标在他们准备合并之前打开合并请求
  • Integration with milestones/labels for merge request context
  • 在请求合并时,团队成员可以订阅通知
  • Diff of changes between source and base branch
  • 与外部连续集成工具集成
  • One-click merge and delete source branch

One usablity difference in Gitlab is that you have to make a couple clicks to get to the diff of changes - they aren't shown by default.

While Github's pull request process has the most unique features, it may be distracting if your team doesn't need all of them. Creating a sustainable, repeatable workflow is often better than trying to do everything.

一体化

存储库托管平台的另一个常用用例是触发持续集成, or连续部署。通常,团队将使用其他服务来管理这些任务,因此将其源控制库与第三方服务链接的能力是GitHub,Bitbucket和Gitlab的另一个核心功能。

GitHub.’s marketplace recently underwent an overhaul, so they now have two places for integrations with third party tools: theGitHub市场适用于GitHub.。Marketplace较小,但它允许第三方应用程序通过Github实际销售服务。与Github的合作拥有与其他现有服务的数百个集成。GitHub也有强大的休息API如果您需要创建自己的自定义集成。

Bitbucket由Atlassian拥有,所以如果你使用贾拉或者竹子您可以欣赏Bitbucket的内置集成。Bitbucket也有一个强大的app marketplace, 和an API这允许您构建您自己的集成。值得注意的是,Bitbucket有自己的管道tool that can do your continuous integration and delivery for you.

While Gitlab has fewer built-in integrations (20 are listed在管理文档中)比github或bitbucket,它是开源,这意味着可以自定义代码的任何部分。这很少是必要的,因为它们也提供了强大的plugin system休息API.。You can evencustomize the login page和用户界面,以项目的团队的个性或公司的品牌。Gitlab还提供它自己的连续集成工具built into the platform.

开源项目的可见性

GitHub是开源项目最受欢迎的源控制管理工具,因为它对可见性也很好。GitHub上托管的项目可以拥有自己的面向公开的问题,项目,团队和拉拔要求。他们也可以搜索,并且可以在Github的每日或每周通讯中出现。GitHub包括用于静态站点的免费托管解决方案,因此开源项目可以在平台上免费提供他们的文档或降落页面。

Gitlab.offers最主题的名单, search feature, and free static site hosting, but they do not offer quite as many features for user profiles. For example, you cannot follow users on Gitlab like you can on Github.

Finally, Bitbucket has the option to create public repositories, but they目前尚未提供搜索功能。Bitbucket的用户配置文件也是贫血的静态站点托管不允许自定义域名。

Sometimes public visibility isn’t a feature you want though. For example, some teams want source control to be completely locked down to a private network. In this case, you should consider whether or not your repository hosting platform can be self-hosted. In this case,GitHub.,Gitlab., 和Bitbucketall offer self-hosted versions of their product, but the pricing varies quite a bit.

价钱

所有这三种存储库管理平台的定价有两个味道:云托管和自托管。

Cloud-Hosted Pricing Comparison

If your organization is able to use the lowest-tier cloud-hosted version of each platform, your costs will typically grow as a function of team size and whether or not the code you’re hosting is open source.

*注意:GitHub还包括想要私人存储库的个人的7美元/月计划。

Each platform offers slightly different offerings at higher price points. For example, Github offers a 99.95% uptime SLA and 24/5 tech support starting at $21 per user per month, Bitbucket offers security features like IP whitelisting and required two-step verification starting at $5 per user per month, and Gitlab will give you more CI build minutes and a host of project management features for $19 per user per month. Bitbucket and Gitlab offer free trials if you think you might need some of these premium features.

Once your needs get more complex, I’d recommend checking out each provider’s hosting page to do your own comparison:

自主定价比较

所有这三项服务还提供自主主机选项 - 通常用于企业客户或具有特殊安全要求的用户。

While Github and Bitbucket offer self-hosting, only Gitlab is open source, which allows its self-hosted option to be the cheapest. That said, you may want additional support support,, so be sure to check out the pricing pages above to make sure you’re getting the best plan for your needs.

Git.Hub vs Bitbucket vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Git.Hub,Bitbucket, 和Gitlab.are code collaboration and version control tools offering repository management. They each have their share of fans, though GitHub is by far the most-used of the three. Of the three, only GitLab is open source, though all three support open source projects. GitHub offers free public repositories; Bitbucket also offers free private repositories; GitLab offers a Community Edition which is entirely free.

关于Bitbucket,GitHub和Gitlab的建议
需要建议
JFROG ARICATTORY.
Git.Hub

Whenever Qualys scan finds out software vulnerability, say for exampleJavaSDK或任何具有潜在漏洞的软件版本,我们搜索Web找出解决方案,通常安装从Web下载的后续版本或修补程序。问题是,正如我们从Web下载,并且有许多服务器我们修补程序以及终极结果不同人员下载不同的版本等等。所以我想为这样的二进制文件创建一个存储库,以便我们对所有服务器使用相同的补丁。

当我在考虑回购时,显然首先想到了Git.Hub。。But then I realized, it is for code version control and collaboration, not for the packaged software. The other option I am thinking isJFROG ARICATTORY.存储二进制文件和包软件。

What is your recommendation?

查看更多
关于Bitbucket,GitHub和Gitlab的决定
Elmar Wouters
CEO, Managing Directorat Wouters Media· | 6问题·亚博平台怎么样24.4 k的观点

我第一次使用bitbucket,因为它有私人回购,它并没有让我失望。同样随着JIRA的顺利集成,使用Bitbucket作为完整应用程序维护服务的决定和1,2,3的决定也很容易。

老实说,我诚实地爱着Bitbucket,由UI,与塔的顺利集成。

查看更多

在分配审稿人之前,您是否在审核您的拉/合并请求?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • 妥善命名
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • 获取必要的数据
  • 了解共同性
  • 传递消息
  • 添加屏幕截图
  • 在未来找到
  • Comment inline in your changes

阅读博客文章以获取每个项目的更详细说明:D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

查看更多

使用包容性语言对于培养多种文化至关重要。Git改变了命名约定,以更具语言包容性,所以你应该改变。我们的开发工具,如Github和Gitlab,已经支持了更改。

Sourcelevel与存储库非常好,将主分支更改为更合适的单词。此外,您可以使用Grep Linter查看源代码中包含的独占项。

由于我们生活的其他方面可能会发生包容性语言差距,您是否已经过考虑过它们?

查看更多

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, butgit rebase -i是我最常用的那个。使用此命令,可以切换提交顺序,删除提交,屏幕两次或多个提交,或编辑。

在打开拉申请之前,它特别有用。它允许开发人员在提交审查之前“清理”混乱并组织提交。如果您遵循练习3和4,则提交列表应非常相似于任务列表。它应该揭示你所拥有的理由,讲述了你最终的故事的故事。

查看更多
Kamaleshwar BN.
Head of Engineering在Dibiz Pte。有限公司· |8 Hu亚博平台怎么样bvotes·189.4K视图

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

查看更多

Gitlab作为Github和Azure Devops缺少的大量功能。即使Microsoft支持GH和Azure,Gitlab是开放的来源也有更快的升级率,Gitlab.com解决方案托管似乎比其他任何东西更具吸引力!快速获胜:UI更好,管道在Gitlab上更容易设置!

查看更多
纳扎尔阿曼尼克
共享见解
部署
Git.Hub
Gitlab.

在DeployPlace我们使用自托管GitLab,我们有chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.

查看更多
Bitbucket的利弊
Pros of GitHub
Pros of GitLab

注册添加或升空专业人士Make informed product decisions

bitbucket的缺点
GitHub的缺点
Gitlab的缺点

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions